A team of more than 50 ERM leaders and experts were on the ground at London Climate Action Week (LCAW) 2025. The 2025 iteration was by far the largest in the gathering’s seven-year history, with over 45,000 participants. ERM organized more than 10 events, including several with partners like the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and the Natural Climate Solutions Alliance (NSCA).
The week commenced with the launch of the WBCSD Business Breakthrough Barometer. To many people’s pleasant surprise, the Barometer reveals that 91 percent of 300 leading global businesses have maintained or increased investments in the clean energy and net zero transition vs 12 months ago, with 56 percent citing competitiveness as their primary reason for doing so. At least for this group of companies, backlash is not resulting in backslide.
Our team captured several key takeaways from our LCAW discussions with business leaders, investors, policymakers, and representatives of civil society organizations. We share insights on how to get from volatility to value and more below.
- With global uncertainty and upheaval prominent, companies need clear action plans to avoid being blown off course. The ERM-convened Council on Sustainability Transformation launched a report in the lead up to LCAW exploring how companies can reframe and retool their approaches to sustainability during this time of change.
- With the cost of inaction rising, companies need to quantify ‘do nothing’ options alongside other investment cases and take action that makes progress towards climate goals and generates business value simultaneously.
- An event we held with WBCSD on industrial heat highlighted how companies are expanding investments in renewable heat despite economic incertitude. Companies are turning towards technological innovation and partnerships to drive progress even when policy support may be insufficient.
- A one-size-fits-all-geographies approach no longer works as companies shift from goal setting to implementation, as implementation needs to be tailored to each operating environment.
- Success depends on recognizing that the energy transition is place-based and emphasizing just transition. The effects of the transition will be felt most where activities occur (e.g., job creation or losses, local economic empowerment or displacement, enhanced adaptive capacity, etc.).
- No transition plan will succeed without people. Corporate speakers at a just transition roundtable we hosted in partnership with WBCSD said companies must account for the people-related impacts of their transitions and engage people in transition solutions.
- During an infrastructure-focused workshop hosted with WBCSD, participants stressed the importance of turning a local lens to physical risk mitigation and recognizing that direct (e.g., property damage) and indirect (e.g., supply chain disruptions) risks will vary by site and geography.
Creating value requires getting into the details
- Ana Toni, the CEO of COP30, said that businesses need to identify very specifically what they require to progress towards their climate goals. Doing this will enable ‘unlocks’ from policy makers, investors, and others in country plans (like Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plans).
- The complexity of implementing targets and plans within the current operating environment is forcing companies to get down to details. ERM held LCAW sessions on the electrification of industrial heat, long-duration energy storage, and climate markets, including removals and decarbonization in the manufacturing and pharmaceutical sectors.
- Identifying how sustainability programs create enterprise value is essential. Whether growing market share, lowering operating costs, enhancing energy security, or lowering costs of capital, there are many opportunities to add value A blog ERM published before LCAW explores how companies can use financial quantification to help visualize the full benefits of their sustainability-related actions. There are hurdles as well. Companies participating in a financial quantification roundtable we co-hosted with WBCSD stressed that a lack of consistency in data quality and availability makes quantification difficult.
- Defining the narrative for your company’s climate action is critical. If you do not tell your story, someone else will. There is no room for greenhushing in a world where investors, policymakers, other businesses, and stakeholders demand to see evidence of tangible action linked to quantified outcomes.
- Outputs on sustainability – however impressive the metrics – mean little until they are set in the context of what matters to stakeholders. Think about framing your story from the outside in, starting with the meaningful outcomes you can deliver.
- Communication is an important vehicle for translating the financial quantification of sustainability into language that resonates within and beyond your organization. Tone matters—it is so important to be positive! Participants in an ERM/WBCSD session on quantification and communication stressed the need to avoid overemphasizing risk; human beings respond to inspiration.
- Narrative consistency is key—there cannot be one message for employees and another for investors. Participants at an ERM roundtable on sustainability in a volatile world emphasized the importance of transparent and consistent stakeholder communication in building trust and credibility.
- Opportunities emerge during volatility. Companies we spoke with are keeping their eyes open for places where they can create value and build sustainability momentum at the same time. Companies and financial institutions in Asia, for example, are innovating and investing in response to market needs, while global participants at an ERM-supported session on energy storage highlighted the use of the technology as a solution that can generate significant financial opportunity and be a powerful force for decarbonization.
- Carbon markets and water were high on the opportunity agenda at many of the sessions in which ERM participated. Companies are determining how to build business cases for these and other nature-related issues and integrate them into their sustainability strategies. As companies face pressure to achieve targets, participants underscored the importance of high-quality carbon credits. While concerns remain about greenwashing, logistical barriers, and the need for clearer standards and metrics, there was a consensus that demand stimulation, policy clarity, and technological innovation are crucial to scaling this key market.
Delivering in uncharted territory
Amidst the backdrop of an ever-changing world, a sense of what’s possible in the delivery of climate solutions that make commercial sense spread throughout the biggest LCAW ever. Themes like adaptation, value creation, narration, and opportunity identification emerged as strategies capable of helping companies forge ahead into uncharted territory. ERM was honored to contribute to the conversation.