The Raters Response
Rate the Raters: Phase Five
It’s Your Turn to Rate the Raters
In this final piece of Rate the Raters Phase 5, we publish the responses from a number of sustainability raters to a questionnaire we posed to them. We do this to promote greater transparency and to provide users – companies, investors and others – a better understanding of how these ratings work. SustainAbility has not edited or evaluated the content of these documents. Instead, we want our readers to use this information, and the methodology we developed in Phase 3, to form their own opinions. We want to hear from readers on the good practices that should be disseminated and opportunities for further improvement.
Since initiating our Rate the Raters work in 2010, we have learned a great deal about ratings, and have seen a number of improvements. For example, just last week CDP and RobecoSAM announced a collaboration in which the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices will ask the same climate change questions asked by the CDP. This streamlining addresses a common company complaint (i.e. duplicative questions) and is something we’ve advocated for in our work.
Yet, new ratings continue to pop up, for example over the last several months we have seen the launch of Oxfam’s Behind the Brands Scorecard, the Access to Nutrition Index and The Civic 50. Without judging the objectives and approaches of these and other ratings, it’s important that their founders consider the sort of questions we have posed in our survey, and consider how their ratings are advancing the corporate sustainability agenda, rather than adding additional burden and complexity to it. For these ratings and others not included on our website, we will request responses to our questionnaire.
We encourage our readers to review these responses through the lens of our methodology (which is also available for download below) and engage ratings organizations. Tell them where they are doing good work, and advocate for change. SustainAbility will remain active in the ratings agenda, as we believe they are critical tools in improving corporate sustainability performance. We will continue to press for greater transparency and quality, for example in advising the Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings, and we will engage the raters with which we have developed constructive relationships over the last several years.
As always, we welcome your perspectives and ideas on how to advance the ratings agenda, Michael Sadowski – firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Rate the Raters: Phase 3 - Methodology PDF - 333 kB Download Download
- Access to Medicine Index PDF - 345 kB Download Download
- CDP Scoring Methodology PDF - 196 kB Download Download
- Corporate Knights PDF - 415 kB Download Download
- Climate Counts PDF - 192 kB Download Download
- Corporate Responsibility Magazine PDF - 264 kB Download Download
- CSRHub PDF - 295 kB Download Download
- Dow Jones Sustainability indices PDF - 307 kB Download Download
- EcoVadis PDF - 256 kB Download Download
- EIRIS PDF - 490 kB Download Download
- FTSE4Good ESG Ratings PDF - 538 kB Download Download
- FTSE4Good Index Series PDF - 521 kB Download Download
- GoodGuide PDF - 295 kB Download Download
- Maplecroft Climate Innovation Indexes PDF - 355 kB Download Download
- Newsweek Green Rankings PDF - 224 kB Download Download
- Oekom Research AG PDF - 339 kB Download Download
- Sustainalytics PDF - 294 kB Download Download
- Trucost Environmental Register PDF - 260 kB Download Download
- Tomorrows Value Rating PDF - 217 kB Download Download
- Vigeo PDF - 431 kB Download Download
From the Blog
Denise Delaney reports back from the WBCSD Business Day event and finds trust and collaboration to b…
This month we look at how transparency could help in the fight against corruption and evaluate solar…
- 19 Nov 2013 – Jeff Erikson to Moderate WBCSD Midwest Conference 2013
- 19 Nov 2013 – SustainAbility & GlobeScan Present Webcast on Extended Leadership: How to Accelerate Progress in Sustainability to 2020
- 07 Nov 2013 – Newsletter > Why cities hold the secret to sustainability and more...